Emma Watson defends her cleavage-baring photo

WHY should we care about this stupid story???? Emma Watson's Tits?

Emma Watson defends her cleavage-baring photo

Boerum Hill
Brooklyn Heights
Carroll Gardens
Cobble Hill
DUMBO
Gowanus
Park Slope
Red Hook
Beyond South Brooklyn

We are starting a new feature here at SouthBrooklyn.com, WHY should we care about this stupid story????, because the Internet makes so many stories so blown out of proportion. Many of them are just so ridiculous that we can't help commenting on them.

Our first is today's rant against Emma Watson's Feminism based on the fact that she showed her cleavage and sides of her breasts in a Vanity Fair photograph. REALLY? THIS IS ABOUT FEMINISM?

We all know that the real reason for the photograph was to SELL MAGAZINES! It has nothing to do with feminism and everything about circulation.

Today's New York Post elaborates on the story and we are just mortified:

"British journalist Julia Hartley-Brewer suggested the image, taken by fashion photographer Tim Walker, was hypocritical, given Watson’s feminist advocacy.

British journalist Julia Hartley-Brewer suggested the image, taken by fashion photographer Tim Walker, was hypocritical, given Watson’s feminist advocacy."

This brought about a great reply from Emma:

“I really don’t know what my t- -s (OBVIOUSLY TITS! which the paper would not print) have to do with it. It’s very confusing,” the 26-year-old British actress and activist told Reuters while promoting her new flick, Disney’s live-action “Beauty and the Beast.”

Listen to her response on BBC.com!